The step of the article that I found to be the easiest is the abstract and the conclusion. I was able to get a general idea of what the article was about. I felt that the abstract was able to describeclearly described the three experiments without readingneeding to read the whole article and the conclusion was able to tell me the findings of the experiments. Also, describingIt also described their point of view on air pollution and how it connects to carbon monoxide in the air.
What I am findingfound the most difficult about reading the article iswas the jargon. The scientific terminology is meant for scholars and experts in the carbon monoxide field. I have minimal knowledge onof this scientific topic. When I read the article, it was very confusing to read because I couldn’t follow what was being tested. The section I did not understand was the graphs. The article presented many charts. I did not know what chart represented each plant or what exactly they were testing. The main idea of this article is about different plants and their consumptionproduction of carbon monoxide in different drastic environments.
The text above was approved for publishing by the original author.
Previous
     
Next
받은편지함으로 가서 저희가 보낸 확인 링크를 눌러서 교정본을 받으세요. 더 많은 이메일을 교정받고 싶으시면:
또는